Model 07 of 74 · Leadership & People
Communications & Stakeholder Engagement Maturity Assessment
Assess how effectively your organisation communicates internally and externally, and engages its stakeholders.
Pillars & areas
Engage
Reach the right people
Levels
- 1FragmentedAd-hoc & one-directional
- 2CoordinatedPlanned & intentional
- 3ConnectedStrategic & two-way
01 Internal Communication
How effectively does information flow within the organisation?
0/4 answered
02 Leadership Communication
Do leaders communicate clearly, honestly, and frequently enough?
0/4 answered
03 Stakeholder Identification & Mapping
Does the organisation know who its stakeholders are and what they need?
0/4 answered
04 External Communication & Engagement
How well does the organisation communicate with customers, partners, and the public?
0/4 answered
05 Listening & Feedback
Does the organisation actively listen, and does feedback lead to visible action?
0/4 answered
06 Crisis & Sensitive Communication
How effectively does the organisation communicate during difficult or high-stakes situations?
0/4 answered
Communications & Stakeholder Engagement
Answer the questions above and your report builds here: an overall score, a score and target for each area, and the three changes that matter most.
About this model
About this assessment
About the Communications & Stakeholder Engagement maturity model
How an organisation communicates — internally and externally — shapes everything: trust, alignment, culture, and reputation. Poor communication creates confusion, rumours, and disengagement. Great communication creates clarity, confidence, and shared purpose.
This model assesses the full spectrum of organisational communication: from how leaders share information, to how teams collaborate, to how the organisation engages with external stakeholders. It covers both the mechanisms (channels, frequency, tools) and the culture (openness, honesty, two-way dialogue).
Effective communication is not about sending more messages — it's about ensuring the right people receive the right information at the right time, and have a genuine voice in return.
24 questions across 6 key areas, assessing the maturity of your organisation's internal and external communication and stakeholder engagement. Takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.
Who this assessment is for
- Communications and marketing teams
- Senior leaders and executive teams
- HR and people teams
- Project and programme managers
- Customer-facing and stakeholder management roles
The three maturity levels
- Level 1 — Fragmented: Communication is inconsistent, ad-hoc, and one-directional. Important information doesn't reach the right people, messages conflict across channels, and stakeholders feel ignored or uninformed. There is no coherent communication strategy, and feedback is not actively sought or acted upon.
- Level 2 — Coordinated: Communication is planned and intentional. Key messages are consistent, channels are defined, and important stakeholders are identified and engaged. Internal communication keeps people reasonably informed, and external stakeholders receive regular updates. Feedback mechanisms exist, though they may not always lead to visible action.
- Level 3 — Connected: Communication is a strategic capability that drives alignment, trust, and engagement. Information flows freely in all directions. Stakeholders — internal and external — are genuine partners in dialogue, not passive recipients. The organisation listens as well as it speaks, adapts its communication based on feedback, and is known for its transparency and responsiveness.
The 6 areas assessed
- Internal Communication — How effectively does information flow within the organisation?
- Leadership Communication — Do leaders communicate clearly, honestly, and frequently enough?
- Stakeholder Identification & Mapping — Does the organisation know who its stakeholders are and what they need?
- External Communication & Engagement — How well does the organisation communicate with customers, partners, and the public?
- Listening & Feedback — Does the organisation actively listen, and does feedback lead to visible action?
- Crisis & Sensitive Communication — How effectively does the organisation communicate during difficult or high-stakes situations?
How this model relates to other frameworks
- International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) standards
- Institute of Internal Communication (IoIC) framework
- AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard
- CIPD Employee Voice guidance
- Edelman Trust Barometer (trust in organisations)
Frequently asked questions
What is the Communications & Stakeholder Engagement maturity model?
Assess how effectively your organisation communicates internally and externally, and engages its stakeholders. It is an original, simplified model with three maturity levels (Fragmented, Coordinated and Connected), assessed through 24 questions across 6 areas: Internal Communication, Leadership Communication, Stakeholder Identification & Mapping, External Communication & Engagement, Listening & Feedback and Crisis & Sensitive Communication.
How long does the Communications & Stakeholder Engagement assessment take?
Most people finish in 10–14 minutes. Each of the 24 questions has three concrete answer options. Your progress is saved in the page URL, so you can bookmark it and come back later.
How is the score calculated?
Each answer scores 1 (Fragmented), 2 (Coordinated) or 3 (Connected). An area's score is the average of its answered questions, and the overall score is the average of the area scores, so every area counts equally. Scores run from 1.0 to 3.0.
Is my data stored or shared?
No. Your answers are never sent to a server. They are stored only in the page URL, which you control. Copy the link to share results with colleagues, or export a PDF or CSV report.
How should I use the results?
Start with "Where to focus" in your report. It lists the questions with the biggest gap to the target you set for each area, and shows what the next level looks like in practice. For a fuller picture, ask several people from different teams to complete the assessment and compare their links. Differences in perception are often as revealing as the scores themselves.